I am not aware of any issues with such a configuration. In fact, it should be transparent to the Microsoft SQL Server JDBC driver that you are talking to a SQL
Server cluster.
Evan (MSFT)
--------------------
>Thread-Topic: SQL Server JDBC with SQL Server cluster
>thread-index: AciD+bxAKQ4ejvwiRw6FDyqCRKlUvw==
>X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 207.46.193.207
>From: =?Utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gR3VpbGhlcm1l?=
>Subject: SQL Server JDBC with SQL Server cluster
>Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:30:00 -0700
>Lines: 8
>Message-ID:
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="Utf-8"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
>Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
>Importance: normal
>Priority: normal
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2992
>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.jdbcdriver
>Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl
>Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.jdbcdriver:461
>NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftsbfm01.phx.gbl 10.40.244.148
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.jdbcdriver
>
>Hi
>Does anyone know if there are problems or difficulties when accessing a SQL
>Server with cluster, using JDBC?
>In fact, I didn't have any problems yet, but we are preparing an environment
>where such a connection will be needed.
>Thanks!
>
>
>
Evan T. Basalik
This posting is provided “AS IS” with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>> Stay informed about: SQL Server JDBC with SQL Server cluster