You should read up on fixed database roles:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Security/sqlserversecurityfix...atabase
--
Tom
----------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA, MCITP, MCTS
SQL Server MVP
Toronto, ON Canada
https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Tom.Moreau
"Munish Narula" wrote in message
Say i have to create a role with minimum privileges having permissions to
execute sp_adduser. But it seems i need to be a dbo to perform that
operation.
So in order to run sp_adduser a user must be a dbo. Now that is not what i
intend to do because if i make the person as a dbo it will enjoy many more
priveleges which i dont want to give. I want a user to have permission on
only one procedure and that is sp_adduser (and ofcourse the procedures
dependent on sp_adduser as well) and nothing else.
So what is the best way to solve such a problem both in SQL 2000 and SQL
2005.
"Tom Moreau" wrote:
> Can you be more specific?
>
> --
> Tom
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA, MCITP, MCTS
> SQL Server MVP
> Toronto, ON Canada
> https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Tom.Moreau
>
>
> "Munish Narula" wrote in message
>
> I am trying to implement segregation of duties in sql 2005. Can you please
> suggest me how to go about it.
>
> >> Stay informed about: segregation of duties in sql 2005